Sony's Discovery Removals And Account Bans Are Reminders Of Why Users Don't Really Own Digital Content + more news.Mobile Companies Have Backed Themselves Into A Corner By Racing To Roll Out 5G, Taking On Piles Of Debt + more news.Streaming Apps Are Trying To Bundle Their Way Out Of Customer Disenchantment + more notable news.You Still Don't Own What You Bought: Purchased TV Shows From PS Store Go Bye Bye + more notable news.If you really need to screen scrape the site, I would look for 'Angular SPA Screen Scraper' LoadRunner was not able to record anything when links were clicked, because that action didn't cause any HTTP traffic to occur. In this instance it wasn't a big deal for us since that was the load we were looking to test. LoadRunner couldn't understand the actually application because all it records are HTTP calls. Links within the application are probably also not hard links, but designed to have the web app re-render with a different view, again, a ripper would need to be sufficiently complex to recognize this, as for the most part the outbound/inbound traffic for this is probably only the data fetches.Įxample: I lead a team building an Angular application for an organization, we did load testing on it with LoadRunner. Likely when you saved the html in chrome you just saved the resulting html after the application had executed. This means that if you were to point a tool at and it was an angular application, the tool would have to be able to load whatever was sent, and be able to process all the javascript that is needed to execute the application. What you have to understand is Angular doesn't work like old style web application what run on the server and feed up static html/css content, it lives and runs completely in the web browser, it makes callbacks to a server for content, and does so asynchronously. with the HTML I needYes, as I said after the page has been fully rendered. You would need a site ripper that will do the same, I don't use these types of tools, so I can't help with which one will work.no no I tested it - it saves them just fine. It can only do that because the app has already run what it needs to in order to generate the page. Hmm what website ripper can I use successfully? thank youĬhrome is likely saving the static version of the page as it exists now, after rendering. Perhaps I can get some Chrome site ripper with limited connectionsĪgain if I go to any indigogo page and right click on any link HTTrack Website Copier/3.48-22 mirror complete in 2 minutes 58 seconds : 3 links scanned, 2 files written (37608 bytes overall), 2 files updated, 37608 bytes transferred using HTTP compression in 2 files, ratio 30% Such as username/password authentication for websites mirrored in this projectĭo not share these files/folders if you want these information to remain privateĢ0:04:39 Error: "File Cache Entry Not Found" (-1) at link » Note: the hts-log.txt file, and hts-cache folder, may contain sensitive information, Information, Warnings and Errors reported for this mirror:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |